TEACHER CERTIFICATION DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM

Sutriana; Khozainuz Zuhri; Fatimah Fahurian Fahurian; Yodhi Yuniarthe

doi:10.59025/jtech.v1i1.3

Authors

Sutriana Universitas Mitra
Khozainuz Zuhri Universitas Mitra
Fatimah Universitas Mitra
Yodhi Yuniarthe Universitas Mitra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59025/jtech.v1i1.3

Keywords:

Computerized, Information Systems, SAW, Website

Abstract

Technology in education in Indonesia has continued to improve throughout the 21st century. This results in a continuous evaluation of the education system, which in turn provides information on educational gaps. SMK Persada Bandar Lampung is an educational institution that has problems in assessing the feasibility of teacher certification, which does not yet have a system where errors often occur in the assessment process. Evaluating the feasibility of teacher certification, which is subjective will take time to process the results. In the process of assessing the feasibility of teachers, certification errors may occur. SMK Persada Bandar Lampung requires a decision support system that is expected to find a solution in the process of determining the best teacher. The decision system for assessing the feasibility of teacher certification can facilitate data processing of the results of the teacher certification feasibility assessment at SMK Persada Bandar Lampung.Therefore, the researcher proposes a decision support system software engineering by applying Simple Additive Weighting (SAW). This system can later be used to assess the feasibility of teacher certification at SMK Persada Bandar Lampung to assist schools in evaluating the shortcomings and strengths of teacher performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chou SY, Chang YH, Shen CY. 2008. A fuzzy simple additive weighting system under group decision-making for facility location selection with objective/subjective attributes. European Journal of Operational Research.189(1):132–145. doi:10.1016/J.EJOR.2007.05.006.153

Dewanto IJ, Arrozi MF. 2016. Membangun sistem penunjang keputusan untuk investasi saham dengan metode saw. Seminar Riset Teknologi Informasi (SRITI)

Harsiti H, Aprianti H. 2017. Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Smartphone dengan Menerapkan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW). JSiI (Jurnal Sistem Informasi). 4. doi:10.30656/JSII.V4I0.372. https://e-jurnal.lppmunsera.org/index.php/jsii/article/view/372.

Hathaway T. 2015. Data Flow Diagrams – Simply Put!: Process Modeling Techniques for Requirements Elicitation and Workflow Analysis. Business Analysis Fundamentals.BA-Experts. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=oO29DwAAQBAJ.

Ningsih E, Ningsih E, Dedih D, Supriyadi S. 2017. SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN MENENTUKAN PELUANG USAHA MAKANAN YANG TEPAT MENGGUNAKAN WEIGHTED PRODUCT (WP) BERBASIS WEB. ILKOM Jurnal Ilmiah. 9(3):244–254. doi:10.33096/ilkom.v9i3.150. 244-254. http://jurnal.fikom.umi.ac.id/index.php/ILKOM/article/view/150.

Pressman R. 2014. Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach. McGraw-Hill Education. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=dXlzCgAAQBAJ.

Setyani RE, Saputra R. 2016. Flood-prone Areas Mapping at Semarang City by Using Simple Additive Weighting Method. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences.227:378–386. doi:10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2016.06.089.

Shakouri HG, Nabaee M, Aliakbarisani S. 2014. A quantitative discussion on the assessment of power supply technologies: DEA (data envelopment analysis) and SAW (simple additive weighting) as complementary methods for the “Grammar”. Energy. 64:640–647. doi: 10.1016/J.ENERGY.2013.10.022.

Sulistiyanto M, Apsiswanto U, Setiawan A. 2022. Penerapan metode simple additive weighting (saw) dalam menentukan keluarga miskin (studi kasus: Desa nampirejo).Journal Computer Science and Informatic Systems: J-Cosys. 2(1).

Vafaei N, Ribeiro RA, Camarinha-Matos LM. 2022. Assessing Normalization Techniques for Simple Additive Weighting Method. Procedia Computer Science. 199:1229–1236. doi:10.1016/J.PROCS.2022.01.156.

Vercellis C. 2011. Business Intelligence: Data Mining and Optimization for Decision Making. Wiley. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=Yl_yAn2bhZ0C.

Wang YJ. 2019. Interval-valued fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making based on simple additive weighting and relative preference relation. Information Sciences.503:319–335. doi:10.1016/J.INS.2019.07.012.